RAG: A New Dimension for LLM's Knowledge Application

As large language models (LLMs) increasingly permeate everyday enterprise operations, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology is emerging as a key force in facilitating the practical application of LLMs. By integrating RAG into LLMs, enterprises can significantly enhance the efficiency of knowledge management and information retrieval, effectively empowering LLMs to reach new heights.

The Core Advantages of RAG Technology

The essence of RAG lies in its ability to combine retrieval systems with generative models, allowing LLMs not only to generate text but also to base these outputs on a vast array of pre-retrieved relevant information, resulting in more precise and contextually relevant content. This approach is particularly well-suited to handling large and complex internal enterprise data, helping organizations derive deep insights.

In a podcast interview, Mandy Gu shared her experience with RAG in her company. By integrating the company's self-hosted LLM with various internal knowledge bases, such as Notion and GitHub, Mandy and her team built a robust knowledge retrieval system that automatically extracts information from different data sources every night and stores it in a vector database. Employees can easily access this information via a web application, asking questions or issuing commands in their daily work. The introduction of RAG technology has greatly improved the efficiency of information retrieval, enabling employees to obtain more valuable answers in less time.

The Integration of Self-Hosted LLM and RAG

RAG not only enhances the application of LLMs but also offers great flexibility in terms of data security and privacy protection. Mandy mentioned that when they initially used OpenAI’s services, an additional layer of personal information protection was added to safeguard sensitive data. However, this extra layer reduced the efficiency of generative AI, making it challenging for employees to handle sensitive information. As a result, they transitioned to a self-hosted open-source LLM and utilized RAG technology to securely and efficiently process sensitive data.

Self-hosted LLMs give enterprises greater control over their data and can be customized according to specific business needs. This makes the combination of LLMs and RAG a highly flexible solution, capable of addressing diverse business requirements.

The Synergy Between Quantized Models and RAG

In the interview, Namee Oberst highlighted that the combination of RAG technology and quantized models, such as Llama.cpp, can significantly reduce the computational resources required by LLMs, allowing these large models to run efficiently on smaller devices. This technological breakthrough means that the application scenarios for LLMs will become broader, ranging from large servers to laptops, and even embedded devices.

Although quantized models may compromise on accuracy, they offer significant advantages in reducing latency and speeding up response times. For enterprises, this performance boost is crucial, especially in scenarios requiring real-time decision-making and high responsiveness.

The Future Prospects of Empowering LLM Applications with RAG

RAG technology provides robust support for the implementation of LLM applications, enabling enterprises to quickly extract valuable information from massive amounts of data and make more informed decisions based on this information. As RAG technology continues to mature and become more widely adopted, we can foresee that the application of LLMs will not only be limited to large enterprises but will also gradually spread to small and medium-sized enterprises and individual users.

Ultimately, the "wings" that RAG technology adds to LLM applications will drive artificial intelligence into a broader and deeper era of application, making knowledge management and information retrieval more intelligent, efficient, and personalized. In this process, enterprises will not only enhance productivity but also lay a solid foundation for future intelligent development.

Related Topic

Unlocking the Potential of RAG: A Novel Approach to Enhance Language Model's Output Quality - HaxiTAG
Enterprise-Level LLMs and GenAI Application Development: Fine-Tuning vs. RAG Approach - HaxiTAG
Innovative Application and Performance Analysis of RAG Technology in Addressing Large Model Challenges - HaxiTAG
Revolutionizing AI with RAG and Fine-Tuning: A Comprehensive Analysis - HaxiTAG
The Synergy of RAG and Fine-tuning: A New Paradigm in Large Language Model Applications - HaxiTAG
How to Build a Powerful QA System Using Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Techniques - HaxiTAG
The Path to Enterprise Application Reform: New Value and Challenges Brought by LLM and GenAI - HaxiTAG
LLM and GenAI: The New Engines for Enterprise Application Software System Innovation - HaxiTAG
Exploring Information Retrieval Systems in the Era of LLMs: Complexity, Innovation, and Opportunities - HaxiTAG
AI Search Engines: A Professional Analysis for RAG Applications and AI Agents - GenAI USECASE

Read more →

HaxiTAG Studio: A Technological Paradigm of AI Intelligence and Data Collaboration

In modern enterprise AI applications, building data and AI intelligence capabilities is crucial for technological breakthroughs. The HaxiTAG Intelligent Application Platform has established a comprehensive LLM technology supply chain and software ecosystem that integrates knowledge data, local data, device-edge hosted data, and extended data required for API-hosted inference, thereby providing efficient data management and inference capabilities.

We offer data analysis, screening, evaluation, and due diligence services to several financial institutions, particularly in the areas of corporate background checks and investment target analysis. The complexity of securitization documents, including intricate legal details and maturity terms, often makes them difficult to navigate. Investors, traders, and sales personnel must carefully analyze all aspects of securities during due diligence, including their overall structure, individual loan mechanisms, and seniority structure. Similarly, understanding equity-structured notes requires precise interpretation of the nuanced terminology used by different issuers. Although these documents are relatively short, clients must quickly and efficiently identify key elements such as guarantee/protection mechanisms, payment formulas, and governing laws. Currently, investors primarily rely on keyword searches in PDFs, which can be time-consuming and inefficient when seeking precise answers and relevant context.

Advantages of Large Language Models

LLMs are particularly well-suited to address these challenges, providing a natural language interface capable of delivering contextually relevant responses. However, the challenge lies in the fact that LLMs cannot accurately "learn" specific transactional documents, which can lead to potentially misleading answers. A common solution is the implementation of a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system, which combines efficient document storage with vector database-based retrieval to select relevant text snippets, allowing the LLM to generate accurate answers to user queries through prompt engineering.

To ensure scalability, it is essential to maintain reproducibility and accuracy in these experiments. While the RAG approach has been extensively studied for general use cases, its application in specific deep-domain environments, particularly in finance, warrants further exploration. This study aims to identify the optimal setup for ML systems in such use cases by:

• Defining the correct standards through appropriate questions.
• Weighing the trade-offs between long-context LLMs and RAG solutions in different scenarios (e.g., analyzing OpenAI’s recent release of the 128k-context GPT-4).
• Analyzing the components of this system: vector database similarity search, LLM context comprehension, and the quality of LLM-generated answers.
• Identifying additional components necessary for an optimal system setup, such as UI/UX elements and LLM methodologies.

Model Evaluation and Results

To assess the model's capabilities, subject matter experts (SMEs) selected a set of high-value questions related to investment due diligence. These questions targeted key features of the securities, such as the assets provided, their principal distribution/nominal value, the identity of relevant entities, and geographic distribution. Beyond focusing on key details in the provided documents, the questions were designed to test the LLM’s ability to comprehend various language challenges, including names, dates, places, lists, and tables. This diverse set of questions aimed to highlight the model's strengths and limitations.

We divided the experiments into three major components of the functional RAG tool:

1. Similarity Search Experiment: The goal was to identify relevant portions of the documents to answer our queries. We found that five search results were typically sufficient to construct a representative context for the model. This approach not only improves efficiency but also reduces the amount of information sent to the LLM, thus lowering operational costs and system latency.

2. Context Comprehension Experiment: We evaluated the LLM’s ability to accurately identify supporting evidence in the text snippets returned by the similarity search. In some cases, it was useful to directly quote the source documents or reinforce the LLM-generated answers with the original text. On average, the model correctly identified the text snippet containing the answer 76% of the time and effectively ignored irrelevant paragraphs 91% of the time.

3. Answer Quality Assessment: We analyzed the responses to queries for two distinct purposes: value extraction (answers with specific values such as nominal amounts, dates, issue size, etc.) and textual answers (answers in sentence or paragraph form). For both tasks, we compared the performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, with the latter consistently delivering superior results. For value extraction tasks, GPT-4's accuracy ranged between 75-100%, while for text-based answers, the quality of the generated responses ranged from 89-96%, depending on the complexity of the task. The 128k context window generally performed on par or slightly worse than traditional shorter windows in these cases.

Conclusion

In this study, we analyzed the impact of different designs and configurations on retrieval-augmented systems (RAG) used for investment due diligence on documents related to various financial instruments. Such systems are likely to become integral reasoning components in LLM agent design and in delivering comprehensive AI experiences for our clients. Current experiments show promising results in identifying the correct context and extracting relevant information, suggesting that RAG systems are a viable tool for LLM conversational agents to access when users need to extract specific transactional definitions from vast amounts of financial documents. Overall, the findings from these investigations lay a solid foundation for designing future LLM question-answering tools. However, we recognize that effective retrieval and generation are only part of a fully integrated conversational process design. LLM agents will likely employ a suite of such tools to understand and contextualize a wide range of customer needs, with the right user experience approach playing a crucial role in delivering timely and information-rich financial due diligence experiences for our clients.

The HaxiTAG Intelligent Application Platform is not limited to applications in the financial sector; it also offers extensive potential for complex document analysis in other industries, such as healthcare and legal. With its advanced data collaboration and AI intelligence capabilities, the platform is poised to play a critical role in driving digital transformation across various sectors.

Related Topic

Enterprise-Level LLMs and GenAI Application Development: Fine-Tuning vs. RAG Approach

Innovative Application and Performance Analysis of RAG Technology in Addressing Large Model Challenges

Unlocking the Potential of RAG: A Novel Approach to Enhance Language Model's Output Quality

LLM and GenAI: The New Engines for Enterprise Application Software System Innovation

Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative AI (GenAI) Technologies in Industrial Applications: Overcoming Three Key Challenges

The Path to Enterprise Application Reform: New Value and Challenges Brought by LLM and GenAI

Exploring Information Retrieval Systems in the Era of LLMs: Complexity, Innovation, and Opportunities

HaxiTAG Studio: Pioneering Security and Privacy in Enterprise-Grade LLM GenAI Applications

Five Applications of HaxiTAG's studio in Enterprise Data Analysis

HaxiTAG EiKM: The Revolutionary Platform for Enterprise Intelligent Knowledge Management and Search

Read more →

Mastering Advanced RAG Techniques: Transitioning Generative AI Applications from Prototype to Production

In today's rapidly evolving technological landscape, Generative AI (GenAI) has become a focal point in the tech world. It is widely believed that GenAI will usher in the next industrial revolution, with far-reaching implications. However, while building a prototype of a generative AI application is relatively straightforward, transforming it into a production-ready solution is fraught with challenges. In this article, we will delve into how to transition your Large Language Model (LLM) application from prototype to production-ready solution, and introduce 17 advanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques to help achieve this goal.

Background and Significance of Generative AI

Generative AI technologies have demonstrated the potential to revolutionize how we work and live. The rise of LLMs and multimodal models has made it possible to automate complex data processing and generation tasks. Nevertheless, applying these technologies to real-world production environments requires addressing numerous practical issues, including data preparation, processing, and efficient utilization of model capabilities.

Challenges in Transitioning from Prototype to Production

While building a prototype is relatively simple, transforming it into a production-ready solution requires overcoming multiple challenges. An efficient RAG system needs to address the following key issues:

Data Quality and Preparation: High-quality data forms the foundation of generative AI systems. Raw data must be cleaned, prepared, and processed to ensure it provides effective information support for the model.

Retrieval and Embedding: In RAG systems, retrieving relevant content and performing embeddings are crucial steps. Vector databases and semantic retrieval technologies play important roles in this aspect.

Prompt Generation: Generating contextually meaningful prompts is key to ensuring the model can correctly answer questions. This requires combining user questions, system prompts, and relevant document content.

System Monitoring and Evaluation: In production environments, monitoring system performance and evaluating its effectiveness are critical. LLMOps (Large Language Model Operations) provides a systematic approach to achieve this goal.

Advanced RAG Techniques

To transform a prototype into a production-ready solution, we need to apply some advanced techniques. These techniques not only improve the system's robustness and performance but also effectively address various issues encountered during system scaling. Let's explore 17 key techniques that can significantly enhance your RAG system:

• Raw Data Creation/Preparation:Not only process existing data but also influence document creation to make data more suitable for LLM and RAG applications.

• Indexing/Vectorization:Transform data into embeddings and index them for easier retrieval and processing.

• Retrieval/Filtering:Find relevant content from the index and filter out irrelevant information.

• Post-Retrieval Processing:Preprocess results before sending them to the LLM, ensuring data format and content applicability.

• Generation:Utilize context to generate answers to user questions.

• Routing: Handle overall request routing, such as agent approaches, question decomposition, and passing between models.

• Data Quality: Improve data quality, ensuring accuracy and relevance.

• Data Preprocessing: Process data during application runtime or raw data preparation to reduce noise and increase effectiveness.

• Data Augmentation: Increase diversity in training data to improve model generalization capability.

• Knowledge Graphs: Utilize knowledge graph structures to enhance the RAG system's understanding and reasoning capabilities.

• Multimodal Fusion: Combine text, image, audio, and other multimodal data to improve information retrieval and generation accuracy.

• Semantic Retrieval: Perform information retrieval based on semantic understanding to ensure the relevance and accuracy of retrieval results.

• Self-Supervised Learning: Utilize self-supervised learning methods to improve model performance on unlabeled data.

• Federated Learning: Leverage distributed data for model training and optimization while protecting data privacy.

• Adversarial Training: Improve model robustness and security through training with adversarial samples.

• Model Distillation: Compress knowledge from large models into smaller ones to improve inference efficiency.

• Continuous Learning: Enable models to continuously adapt to new data and tasks through continuous learning methods.

Future Outlook

The future of Generative AI is promising. As technology continues to advance, we can expect to see more innovative application scenarios and solutions. However, achieving these goals requires ongoing research and practice. By deeply understanding and applying advanced RAG techniques, we can better transition generative AI applications from prototypes to production-ready solutions, driving practical applications and development of the technology.

In conclusion, Generative AI is rapidly changing our world, and transitioning it from prototype to production-ready solution is a complex yet crucial process. By applying these 17 advanced RAG techniques, we can effectively address various challenges in this process, enhance the performance and reliability of our AI systems, and ultimately realize the immense potential of Generative AI. As we continue to refine and implement these techniques, we pave the way for a future where AI seamlessly integrates into our daily lives and business operations, driving innovation and efficiency across industries.

Related Topic

Exploring the Black Box Problem of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Its Solutions
The Dual-Edged Sword of Generative AI: Harnessing Strengths and Acknowledging Limitations
Unleashing GenAI's Potential: Forging New Competitive Advantages in the Digital Era
AI Enterprise Supply Chain Skill Development: Key Drivers of Business Transformation
LLM and GenAI: The Product Manager's Innovation Companion - Success Stories and Application Techniques from Spotify to Slack
Generative AI Accelerates Training and Optimization of Conversational AI: A Driving Force for Future Development
Reinventing Tech Services: The Inevitable Revolution of Generative AI

Read more →

Common Solutions for AI Enterprise Applications, Industrial Applications, and Product Development Issues

In the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence (AI), enterprises face numerous challenges in developing and applying AI products. Deciding when to use prompting, fine-tuning, pre-training, or retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a crucial decision point. Each method has its strengths and limitations, suitable for different scenarios. This article will discuss the definitions, applicable scenarios, and implementation steps of these methods in detail, drawing on the practical experiences of HaxiTAG and its partners to provide a beginner’s practice guide for the AI application software supply chain.

Method Definitions and Applicable Scenarios

Prompting

Prompting is a method that involves using a pre-trained model to complete tasks directly without further training. It is suitable for quick testing and low-cost application scenarios. For example, in simple text generation or classification tasks, a large language model can be prompted to quickly obtain results.

Fine-Tuning

Fine-tuning involves further training a pre-trained model on a specific task dataset to optimize model performance. This method is suitable for task-specific model optimization, such as sentiment analysis and text classification. For instance, fine-tuning a pre-trained BERT model on a sentiment analysis dataset in a specific domain can improve its performance in that field.

Pre-Training

Pre-training involves training a model from scratch on a large-scale dataset, suitable for developing domain-specific models from the ground up. For example, in the medical field, pre-training a model using vast amounts of medical data enables the model to understand and generate professional medical language and knowledge.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)

RAG combines information retrieval with generation models, using retrieved relevant information to assist content generation. This method is suitable for complex tasks requiring high accuracy and contextual understanding, such as question-answering systems. In practical applications, RAG can retrieve relevant information from a database and, combined with a generation model, provide users with precise and contextually relevant answers.

Scientific Method and Process

Problem Definition

Clearly define the problem or goal to be solved, determining the scope and constraints of the problem. For example, an enterprise needs to address common customer service issues and aims to automate part of the workflow using AI.

Literature Review

Study existing literature and cases to understand previous work and findings. For instance, understanding the existing AI applications and achievements in customer service.

Hypothesis Formation

Based on existing knowledge, propose explanations or predictions. Hypothesize that AI can effectively address common customer service issues and improve customer satisfaction.

Experimental Design

Design experiments to test the hypothesis, ensuring repeatability and controllability. Determine the data types, sample size, and collection methods. For example, design an experiment to compare customer satisfaction before and after using AI.

Data Collection

Collect data according to the experimental design, ensuring quality and completeness. For instance, collect records and feedback from customer interactions with AI.

Data Analysis

Analyze the data using statistical methods to identify patterns and trends. Assess the changes in customer satisfaction and evaluate the effectiveness of AI.

Results Interpretation

Interpret the data analysis results and evaluate the extent to which they support the hypothesis. For example, if customer satisfaction significantly improves, it supports the hypothesis.

Conclusion

Draw conclusions based on the results, confirming or refuting the initial hypothesis. The conclusion might be that the application of AI in customer service indeed improves customer satisfaction.

Knowledge Integration

Integrate new findings into the existing knowledge system and consider application methods. Promote successful AI application cases to more customer service scenarios.

Iterative Improvement

Continuously improve the model or hypothesis based on feedback and new information. For instance, optimize the AI for specific deficiencies observed.

Communication

Share research results through papers, reports, or presentations to ensure knowledge dissemination and application.

Ethical Considerations

Ensure the research adheres to ethical standards, especially regarding data privacy and model bias. For example, ensure the protection of customer data privacy and avoid biases in AI decisions.

Implementation Strategy and Steps

Determine Metrics

Identify quality metrics, such as accuracy and recall. For example, measure the accuracy and response speed of AI in answering customer questions.

Understand Limitations and Costs

Identify related costs, including hardware, software, and personnel expenses. For example, evaluate the deployment and maintenance costs of the AI system.

Explore Design Space Gradually

Explore the design space from low to high cost, identifying diminishing returns points. For instance, start with simple AI systems and gradually introduce complex functions.

Track Return on Investment (ROI)

Calculate ROI to ensure that the cost investment yields expected quality improvements. For instance, evaluate the ROI of AI applications through changes in customer satisfaction and operational costs.

Practice Guide

Definition and Understanding

Understand the definitions and distinctions of different methods, clarifying their respective application scenarios.

Evaluation and Goal Setting

Establish measurement standards, clarify constraints and costs, and set clear goals.

Gradual Exploration of Design Space

Explore the design space from the least expensive to the most expensive, identifying the best strategy. For example, start with prompting and gradually introduce fine-tuning and pre-training methods.

Core Problem Solving Constraints

Data Quality and Diversity

The quality and diversity of data directly affect model performance. Ensure that the collected data is of high quality and representative.

Model Transparency and Interpretability

Ensure the transparency and interpretability of model decisions to avoid biases. For instance, use explainable AI techniques to increase user trust in AI decisions.

Cost and Resource Constraints

Consider hardware, software, and personnel costs, and the availability of resources. Evaluate the input-output ratio to ensure project economy.

Technology Maturity

Choose methods suitable for the current technological level to avoid the risks of immature technology. For example, opt for widely used and validated AI technologies.

Conclusion

AI product development involves complex technical choices and optimizations, requiring clear problem definition, goal setting, cost and quality evaluation, and exploration of the best solutions through scientific methods. In practical operations, attention must be paid to factors such as data quality, model transparency, and cost-effectiveness to ensure efficient and effective development processes. This article's discussions and practice guide aim to provide valuable references for enterprises in choosing and implementing AI application software supply chains.

Related topic:

From Exploration to Action: Trends and Best Practices in Artificial Intelligence
Exploring the Application of LLM and GenAI in Recruitment at WAIC 2024
Enterprise Brain and RAG Model at the 2024 WAIC:WPS AI,Office document software
The Transformation of Artificial Intelligence: From Information Fire Hoses to Intelligent Faucets
Leveraging Generative AI to Boost Work Efficiency and Creativity
The Digital Transformation of a Telecommunications Company with GenAI and LLM
Mastering the Risks of Generative AI in Private Life: Privacy, Sensitive Data, and Control Strategies

Read more →