Get GenAI guide

Access HaxiTAG GenAI research content, trends and predictions.

Showing posts with label AI in consulting. Show all posts

Thursday, July 31, 2025

Four Strategic Steps for AI-Driven Procurement Transformation: Maturity Assessment, Buy-or-Build Decision, Capability Enablement, and Value Capture

July 31, 2025

Four Strategic Steps for AI-Driven Procurement Transformation: Maturity Assessment, Buy-or-Build Decision, Capability Enablement, and Value Capture

Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into procurement is not a one-off endeavor, but a structured journey that requires four critical stages. These are: conducting a comprehensive digital maturity assessment, making strategic decisions on whether to buy or build AI solutions, empowering teams with the necessary skills and change management, and continuously capturing financial value through improved data insights and supplier negotiations. This article draws from leading industry practices and the latest research to provide an in-depth analysis of each stage, offering procurement leaders a practical roadmap for advancing their AI transformation initiatives with confidence.

Digital Maturity Assessment

Before embarking on AI adoption, organizations must first evaluate their level of digital maturity to accurately identify current pain points and future opportunities. AI maturity models offer procurement leaders a strategic framework to map out their current state across technological infrastructure, team capabilities, and the digitization of procurement processes—thereby guiding the development of a realistic and actionable transformation roadmap.

According to McKinsey, a dual-track approach is essential: one track focuses on implementing high-impact, quick-win AI and analytics use cases, while the other builds a scalable data platform to support long-term innovation. Meanwhile, DNV’s AI maturity assessment methodology emphasizes aligning AI ambitions with organizational vision and industry benchmarks to ensure clear prioritization and avoid isolated, siloed technologies.

Buy vs. Build: Technology Decision-Making

A pivotal question facing many organizations is whether to purchase off-the-shelf AI solutions or develop customized systems in-house. Buying ready-made solutions often enables faster deployment, provides user-friendly interfaces, and requires minimal in-house AI expertise. However, such solutions may fall short in meeting the nuanced and specialized needs of procurement functions.

Conversely, organizations with higher AI ambitions may prefer to build tailored systems that deliver deeper visibility into spending, contract optimization, and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) alignment. This route, however, demands strong internal capabilities in data engineering and algorithm development, and requires careful consideration of long-term maintenance costs versus strategic benefits.

As Forbes highlights, successful AI implementation depends not only on technology, but also on internal trust, ease of use, and alignment with long-term business strategy—factors often overlooked in the buy-vs.-build debate. Initial investment and ongoing iteration costs should also be factored in early to ensure sustainable returns.

Capability Enablement and Team Empowerment

AI not only accelerates existing procurement workflows but also redefines them. As such, empowering teams with new skills is crucial. According to BCG, only 10% of AI’s total value stems from algorithms themselves, while 20% comes from data and platforms—and a striking 70% is driven by people’s ability to adapt to and embrace new ways of working.

A report by Economist Impact reveals that 64% of enterprises already use AI tools in procurement. This shift demands that existing employees develop data analysis and decision support capabilities, while also incorporating new roles such as data scientists and AI engineers. Leadership must champion change management, foster open communication, and create a culture of experimentation and continuous learning to ensure skills development is embedded in daily operations.

Hackett Group emphasizes that the most critical future skills for procurement teams include advanced analytics, risk assessment, and cross-functional collaboration—essential for navigating complex negotiations and managing supplier relationships. Supply Chain Management Review also notes that AI empowers resource-constrained organizations to "learn by doing," accelerating hands-on mastery and fostering a mindset of continuous improvement.

Capturing Value from Suppliers

The ultimate goal of AI in procurement is to deliver measurable business value. This includes enhanced pre-negotiation insights through advanced data analytics, optimized contract terms, and even influencing suppliers to adopt generative AI (GenAI) technologies to reduce costs across the supply chain.

BCG’s research shows that organizations undertaking these four transformation steps can achieve cost savings of 15% to 45% in select product and service categories. Success hinges on deeply embedding AI into procurement workflows and delivering a compelling initial user experience to foster adoption and scale. Sustained value creation also requires strong executive sponsorship, with clear KPIs and continuous promotion of success stories to ensure AI becomes a core driver of long-term enterprise growth.

Conclusion

In today’s fiercely competitive landscape, AI-powered procurement transformation is no longer optional—it is imperative. It serves as a vital lever for gaining future-ready advantages and building core competitive capabilities. Backed by structured maturity assessments, precise technology decisions, robust capability building, and sustainable value capture, the Hashitag team stands ready to support your procurement organization in navigating the digital tide and achieving intelligent transformation. We hope this four-step framework provides clarity and direction as your organization advances toward the next era of procurement excellence.

In-Depth Insights, Analysis, and Commentary on the Adoption Trends of Agentic AI in Enterprises

July 28, 2025

— A Professional Interpretation of KPMG’s “2025 Q2 AI Pulse” Report

KPMG’s newly released 2025 Q2 AI Pulse Report signals a pivotal inflection point in the enterprise adoption of Agentic AI. According to the report, 68% of large enterprises (with over 1,000 employees) have implemented agent-based AI in their operations, while 33% of all surveyed companies have adopted the technology. This trend illustrates a strategic shift from experimental exploration to operational deployment of generative AI, positioning intelligent agents as core enablers of operational efficiency and revenue growth.

Core Propositions and Key Trends

1. Accelerated Commercialization: From Pilots to Production-Grade Deployments

With 68% of large enterprises and 33% of all companies having deployed Agentic AI, it is evident that intelligent agents are transitioning from proof-of-concept trials to being deeply embedded in core business functions. No longer peripheral tools, agents are now integral to automation, customer interaction, operations, and analytics—serving as “intelligent engines” driving responsiveness and efficiency. This shift from “usable” to “in-use” marks the deepening of enterprise digital transformation.

2. Efficiency and Revenue as Dual Drivers: The Business Value of AI Agents

The report highlights that 46% of companies prioritize “efficiency gains and revenue growth” as primary objectives for adopting AI agents. This reflects the intense need to both reduce costs and drive new value amid complex market dynamics. Intelligent agents automate repetitive, rule-based tasks, freeing human capital for creative and strategic roles. Simultaneously, they deliver actionable insights, enhance decision-making, and enable personalized services—unlocking new revenue streams. The focus on tangible business outcomes is the primary accelerator of enterprise-wide adoption.

3. Digital Culture and Organizational Evolution: A New Human-Machine Paradigm

The deployment of Agentic AI extends beyond technology—it fundamentally reshapes organizational structures, data flows, access control, and employee roles. Nearly 90% of executives surveyed anticipate a transformation of performance metrics, and 87% recognize the need for upskilling. This underscores a growing consensus that human-AI collaboration will be the new norm. Enterprises must foster a digital culture centered on “co-work between humans and agents,” supported by initiatives such as prompt engineering training and sandbox-based agent simulations, to enable synergistic productivity rather than substitution.

Product and Use Case Insights: Lessons from HaxiTAG

As an enterprise GenAI solution provider, HaxiTAG has operationalized Agentic AI across industries, offering concrete examples of how agents act not just as tools, but as workflow re-shapers and decision assistants.

EiKM – Enterprise Intelligent Knowledge Management
EiKM leverages agents to automate knowledge curation and enable multi-role QA assistants, advancing traditional KM from “information automation” to “cognitive collaboration.” Through multimodal semantic parsing, contextual routing engines, and the AICMS middleware, agents are seamlessly integrated into enterprise systems—enhancing customer service responsiveness and internal learning outcomes.
ESGtank – ESG Intelligent Strategy System
While technical documentation is limited, ESGtank embeds policy-responsive agents that assist with real-time adaptation to regulatory changes and ESG disclosure recommendations. This reflects the potential of Agentic AI in complex compliance and strategy domains, facilitating closed-loop ESG management, reducing risk, and enhancing corporate reputation.
Yueli Knowledge Computation Engine
This engine automates end-to-end workflows from data ingestion to insight delivery. With advanced multimodal comprehension, the Yueli-KGM module, and a multi-model coordination framework, it enables intelligent orchestration of data flows via tasklets and visual pipelines. In finance and government domains, it empowers knowledge distillation and decision support from massive datasets.

Collectively, these cases underscore that agents are evolving into autonomous, context-aware actors that drive enterprise intelligence from data-driven processes to knowledge-centered systems.

Strategic Commentary and Recommendations

To harness Agentic AI as a sustainable competitive advantage, enterprises must align across four dimensions:

Embedded Deployment
Agents must be fully integrated into core business processes rather than isolated in sandbox environments. Only through end-to-end automation can their transformative potential be realized.
Explainability, Security, and Alignment with Governance
As agents assume greater decision-making authority, transparency, logic traceability, data security, and permission control are essential. A robust AI governance framework must ensure compliance with ethics, laws, and internal policies.
Human-Agent Collaborative Culture
Agents should empower, not replace. Enterprises must invest in training and change management to cultivate a workforce capable of co-creating with AI, thus fostering a virtuous cycle of learning and innovation.
From ROI to Organizational Intelligence Maturity
Traditional ROI metrics fail to capture the long-term strategic value of Agentic AI. A multidimensional maturity framework—spanning efficiency, innovation, risk control, employee engagement, and market positioning—should be adopted.

KPMG’s report provides a realistic blueprint for Agentic AI deployment, highlighting the shift from simple tools to autonomous collaborators, and from local process optimization to enterprise-wide synergy.

Conclusion

Driven by generative AI and intelligent agents, the next-generation enterprise will exhibit unprecedented capabilities in real-time coordination and adaptive intelligence. Forward-looking organizations must proactively establish agent-compatible processes, align business and governance models, and embrace human-AI synergy. This is not merely a response to disruption—but a foundational strategy to build lasting, future-ready competitiveness.

To build enterprise-grade AI agent systems and enable knowledge-driven workflow automation, HaxiTAG offers comprehensive solutions such as EiKM, ESGtank, Yueli Engine, and HaxiTAG BotFactory for scalable deployment and intelligent transformation.

Four Core Steps to AI-Powered Procurement Transformation: Maturity Assessment, Build-or-Buy Decisions, Capability Enablement, and Value Capture

July 16, 2025

Applying artificial intelligence (AI) in procurement is not an overnight endeavor—it requires a systematic approach through four core steps. First, organizations must assess their digital maturity to identify current pain points and opportunities. Second, they must make informed decisions between buying off-the-shelf solutions and building custom systems. Third, targeted upskilling and change management are essential to equip teams to embrace new technologies. Finally, AI should be used to capture sustained financial value through improved data analytics and negotiation strategies. This article draws on industry-leading practices and cutting-edge research to unpack each step, helping procurement leaders navigate their AI transformation journey with confidence.

Digital Maturity Assessment

Before embarking on AI adoption, companies must conduct a comprehensive evaluation of their digital maturity to accurately locate both challenges and opportunities. AI maturity models provide a strategic roadmap for procurement leaders by assessing the current state of technological infrastructure, team capabilities, and process digitalization. These insights help define a realistic evolution path based on gaps and readiness.

McKinsey recommends a dual-track approach—rapidly deploying AI and analytics use cases that generate quick wins, while simultaneously building a scalable data platform to support long-term needs. Similarly, DNV’s AI maturity framework emphasizes benchmarking organizational vision against industry standards to help companies set priorities from a holistic perspective and avoid becoming isolated “technology islands.”

Technology: Buy or Build?

One of the most strategic decisions in implementing AI is choosing between purchasing ready-made solutions or building custom systems. Off-the-shelf solutions offer faster time-to-value, mature interfaces, and lower technical entry barriers—but they often fall short in addressing the unique nuances of procurement functions.

Conversely, organizations with greater AI ambitions may opt to build proprietary systems to achieve deeper control over spend transparency, contract optimization, and ESG goal alignment. However, this approach demands significant in-house capabilities in data engineering and algorithm development, along with careful consideration of long-term maintenance costs versus strategic benefits.

Forbes emphasizes that AI success hinges not only on the technology itself but also on factors such as user trust, ease of adoption, and alignment with long-term strategy—key dimensions that are frequently overlooked in the build-vs-buy debate. Additionally, the initial cost and future iteration expenses of AI solutions must be factored into decision-making to prevent unmanageable ROI gaps later on.

Upskilling the Team

AI doesn't just accelerate existing procurement processes—it redefines them. As such, upskilling procurement teams is paramount. According to BCG, only 10% of AI’s value comes from algorithms, 20% from data and platforms, and a staggering 70% from people adapting to new ways of working and being motivated to learn.

Economist Impact reports that 64% of enterprises have already adopted AI tools in procurement. This transformation requires current employees to gain proficiency in data analytics and decision support, while also bringing in new roles such as data scientists and AI engineers. Leaders must foster a culture of experimentation and continuous learning through robust change management and transparent communication to ensure skill development is fully realized.

The Hackett Group further notes that the most critical future skills for procurement professionals include advanced analytics, risk assessment, and cross-functional collaboration. These competencies will empower teams to excel in complex negotiations and supplier management. Supply Chain Management Review highlights that AI also democratizes learning for budget-constrained companies, enabling them to adopt and refine new technologies through hands-on experience.

Capturing Value from Suppliers

The ultimate goal of AI adoption in procurement is to translate technical capabilities into measurable business value—generating negotiation insights through advanced analytics, optimizing contract terms, and even encouraging suppliers to adopt generative AI to reduce total supply chain costs.

BCG’s research shows that a successful AI transformation can yield cost savings of 15% to 45% across select categories of products and services. The key lies in seamlessly integrating AI into procurement workflows and delivering an exceptional initial user experience to drive ongoing adoption and scalability. Sustained value capture also depends on strong executive commitment, regular KPI evaluation, and active promotion of success stories—ensuring that AI transformation becomes an enduring engine of enterprise growth.

Conclusion

In today’s hypercompetitive market landscape, AI-driven procurement transformation is no longer optional—it is essential. It offers a vital pathway to securing future competitive advantages and building core capabilities. At Hashitag, we are committed to guiding procurement teams through every stage of the transformation journey, from maturity assessment and technology decisions to workforce enablement and continuous value realization. We hope this four-step framework provides a clear roadmap for organizations to unlock the full potential of intelligent procurement and thrive in the digital era.

Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations

February 24, 2025

This research report, 《Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations》, authored by the Anthropic team, presents a systematic analysis of AI usage patterns in economic tasks by leveraging privacy-preserving data from millions of conversations on Claude.ai. The study aims to provide empirical insights into how AI is integrated into different occupational tasks and its impact on the labor market.

Research Background and Objectives

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has profound implications for the labor market. However, systematic empirical research on AI’s actual application in economic tasks remains scarce. This study introduces a novel framework that maps over four million conversations on Claude.ai to occupational categories from the U.S. Department of Labor’s O*NET database, identifying AI usage patterns and its impact on various professions. The research objectives include:

Measuring the scope of AI adoption in economic tasks, identifying which tasks and professions are most affected by AI.
Quantifying the depth of AI usage within occupations, assessing the extent of AI penetration in different job roles.
Evaluating AI’s application in different occupational skills, identifying the cognitive and technical skills where AI is most frequently utilized.
Analyzing the correlation between AI adoption, wage levels, and barriers to entry, determining whether AI usage aligns with occupational salaries and skill requirements.
Differentiating AI’s role in automation versus augmentation, assessing whether AI primarily functions as an automation tool or an augmentation assistant enhancing human productivity.

Key Research Findings

1. AI Usage is Predominantly Concentrated in Software Development and Writing Tasks

The most frequently AI-assisted tasks include software engineering (e.g., software development, data science, IT services) and writing (e.g., technical writing, content editing, marketing copywriting), together accounting for nearly 50% of total AI usage.
Approximately 36% of occupations incorporate AI for at least 25% of their tasks, indicating AI’s early-stage integration into diverse industry roles.
Occupations requiring physical interaction (e.g., anesthesiologists, construction workers) exhibit minimal AI usage, suggesting that AI’s influence remains primarily within cognitive and text-processing domains.

2. Quantifying the Depth of AI Integration Within Occupations

Only 4% of occupations utilize AI for over 75% of their tasks, indicating deep AI integration in select job roles.
36% of occupations leverage AI for at least 25% of tasks, signifying AI’s expanding role in various professional task portfolios, though full-scale adoption is still limited.

3. AI Excels in Tasks Requiring Cognitive Skills

AI is most frequently employed for tasks that demand reading comprehension, writing, and critical thinking, while tasks requiring installation, equipment maintenance, negotiation, and management see lower AI usage.
This pattern underscores AI’s suitability as a cognitive augmentation tool rather than a substitute for physically intensive or highly interpersonal tasks.

4. Correlation Between AI Usage, Wage Levels, and Barriers to Entry

Wage Levels: AI adoption peaks in mid-to-high-income professions (upper quartile), such as software development and data analysis. However, very high-income (e.g., physicians) and low-income (e.g., restaurant workers) occupations exhibit lower AI usage, possibly due to:
- High-income roles often requiring highly specialized expertise that AI cannot yet fully replace.
- Low-income roles frequently involving significant physical tasks that are less suited for AI automation.
Barriers to Entry: AI is most frequently used in occupations requiring a bachelor’s degree or higher (Job Zone 4), whereas occupations with the lowest (Job Zone 1) or highest (Job Zone 5) education requirements exhibit lower AI usage. This suggests that AI is particularly effective in knowledge-intensive, mid-tier skill professions.

5. AI’s Dual Role in Automation and Augmentation

AI usage can be categorized into:
- Automation (43%): AI directly executes tasks with minimal human intervention, such as document formatting, marketing copywriting, and code debugging.
- Augmentation (57%): AI collaborates with users in refining outputs, optimizing code, and learning new concepts.
The findings indicate that in most professions, AI is utilized for both automation (reducing human effort) and augmentation (enhancing productivity), reinforcing AI’s complementary role in the workforce.

Research Methodology

This study employs the Clio system (Tamkin et al., 2024) to classify and analyze Claude.ai’s vast conversation data, mapping it to O*NET’s occupational categories. The research follows these key steps:

Data Collection:
- AI usage data from December 2024 to January 2025, encompassing one million interactions from both free and paid Claude.ai users.
- Data was analyzed with strict privacy protection measures, excluding interactions from enterprise customers (API, team, or enterprise users).
Task Classification:
- O*NET’s 20,000 occupational tasks serve as the foundation for mapping AI interactions.
- A hierarchical classification model was applied to match AI interactions with occupational categories and specific tasks.
Skills Analysis:
- The study mapped AI conversations to 35 occupational skills from O*NET.
- Special attention was given to AI’s role in complex problem-solving, system analysis, technical design, and time management.
Automation vs. Augmentation Analysis:
- AI interactions were classified into five collaboration modes:
  - Automation Modes: Directive execution, feedback-driven corrections.
  - Augmentation Modes: Task iteration, knowledge learning, validation.
- Findings indicate a near 1:1 split between automation and augmentation, highlighting AI’s varied applications across different tasks.

Policy and Economic Implications

1. Comparing Predictions with Empirical Findings

The research findings validate some prior AI impact predictions while challenging others:
- Webb (2019) predicted AI’s most significant impact in high-income occupations; however, this study found that mid-to-high-income professions exhibit the highest AI adoption, while very high-income professions (e.g., doctors) remain less affected.
- Eloundou et al. (2023) forecasted that 80% of occupations would see at least 10% of tasks impacted by AI. This study’s empirical data shows that approximately 57% of occupations currently use AI for at least 10% of their tasks, slightly below prior projections but aligned with expected trends.

2. AI’s Long-Term Impact on Occupations

AI’s role in augmenting rather than replacing human work suggests that most occupations will evolve rather than disappear.
Policy recommendations:
- Monitor AI-driven workforce shifts to identify which occupations benefit and which face displacement risks.
- Adapt education and workforce training programs to ensure workers develop AI collaboration skills rather than being displaced by automation.

Conclusion

This research systematically analyzes over four million Claude.ai conversations to assess AI’s integration into economic tasks, revealing:

AI is primarily applied in software development, writing, and data analysis tasks.
AI adoption is widespread but not universal, with 36% of occupations utilizing AI for at least 25% of tasks.
AI usage exhibits a balanced distribution between automation (43%) and augmentation (57%).
Mid-to-high-income occupations requiring a bachelor’s degree show the highest AI adoption, while low-income and elite specialized professions remain less affected.

As AI technologies continue to evolve, their role in the economy will keep expanding. Policymakers, businesses, and educators must proactively leverage AI’s benefits while mitigating risks, ensuring AI serves as an enabler of productivity and workforce transformation.

SEO/SEM Application Scenarios Based on LLM and Generative AI: Leading a New Era in Digital Marketing

October 18, 2024

With the rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI), the fields of SEO and SEM are undergoing revolutionary changes. By leveraging deep natural language understanding and generation capabilities, these technologies are demonstrating unprecedented potential in SEO/SEM practices. This article delves into the application scenarios of LLM and Generative AI in SEO/SEM, providing detailed scenario descriptions to help readers better understand their practical applications and the value they bring.

Core Values and Innovations

Intelligent SEO Evaluation Scenario
Imagine a company's website undergoing regular SEO health checks. Traditional SEO analysis might require manual page-by-page checks or rely on tools that generate basic reports based on rigid rules. With LLM, the system can read the natural language content of web pages, understand their semantic structure, and automatically assess SEO-friendliness using customized prompts. Generative AI can then produce detailed and structured evaluation reports, highlighting keyword usage, content quality, page structure optimization opportunities, and specific improvement suggestions. For example, if a webpage has uneven keyword distribution, the system might suggest, "The frequency of the target keyword appearing in the first paragraph is too low. It is recommended to increase the keyword's presence in the opening content to improve search engine crawl efficiency." Such detailed advice helps SEO teams make effective adjustments in the shortest possible time.
Competitor Analysis and Differentiation Strategy
When planning SEO strategies, companies often need to understand their competitors' strengths and weaknesses. With LLM and Generative AI, the system can quickly extract content from competitors' websites, perform semantic analysis, and compare it with the company's own content. Based on the analysis, the system generates a detailed report, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of competitors in terms of keyword coverage, content depth, user experience, and offers targeted optimization suggestions. For instance, the system might find that a competitor has extensive high-quality content in the "green energy" sector, while the company's content in this area is relatively weak. The system would then recommend increasing the production of such content and suggest potential topics, such as "Future Trends in Green Energy" and "Latest Advances in Green Energy Technologies."
Personalized Content Generation
In content marketing, efficiently producing high-quality content has always been a challenge. Through LLM's semantic understanding and Generative AI's generation capabilities, the system can automatically generate content that meets SEO requirements and has a high degree of originality based on the company's business themes and SEO best practices. This content not only improves search engine rankings but also precisely meets the needs of the target audience. For example, the system can automatically generate an article on "The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare" based on user-input keywords and target audience characteristics. This article would not only cover the latest industry developments but also, through in-depth content analysis, address the key pain points and needs of the target audience, significantly enhancing the article's appeal and utility.
User Profiling and Precision Marketing
In digital marketing, understanding user behavior and devising precision marketing strategies are key to improving conversion rates. By analyzing vast amounts of user behavior data, LLM can build detailed user profiles and provide personalized SEO and SEM optimization suggestions based on these profiles. The system generates a detailed user analysis report based on users' search history, click behavior, and social media interactions, supporting the development of precise traffic acquisition strategies. For example, the system might identify that a particular user group is especially interested in "smart home" products and frequently searches for content related to "home automation" and "smart appliances." Based on this, the system would recommend that the company increase the production of such content and place related keywords in SEM ads to attract more users of this type.
Comprehensive Link Strategy Optimization
Link strategy is an important component of SEO optimization. With LLM's unified semantic understanding model, the system can intelligently analyze the structure of internal and external links on a website and provide optimization suggestions. For instance, the system can analyze the distribution of internal links, identify whether there are unreasonable link structures between pages, and suggest improvements. The system also evaluates the quality and quantity of external links, recommending which external links need strengthening or adjustment. The system might point out, "A high-value content page has too few internal links, and it is recommended to increase the number of internal links to this page to enhance its weight." Additionally, the system might suggest strengthening cooperation with certain high-quality external websites to improve the overall SEO effectiveness of the site.
Automated SEM Strategy Design
In SEM ad placement, selecting the right keywords and devising effective placement strategies are crucial. By analyzing market keyword trends, competition levels, and user intent, the system can automatically generate SEM placement strategies. The generated strategies will include suggested keyword lists, budget allocation, ad copy suggestions, and regular real-time data analysis reports to help companies continuously optimize ad performance. For example, the system might discover that "certain long-tail keywords have lower competition but higher potential conversion rates, and it is recommended to increase the placement of these keywords." The system would also track the performance of the ads in real-time, providing adjustment suggestions, such as "reduce budget allocation for certain low-conversion keywords to improve overall ROI."

Practical Application Scenarios and Functional Value

SEO-Friendliness Evaluation: By fine-tuning prompts, the system can perform SEO evaluations for different types of pages (e.g., blog posts, product pages) and generate detailed reports to help companies identify areas for improvement.
Competitor Website Analysis: The system can evaluate not only the company's website but also analyze major competitors' websites and generate comparison reports to help the company formulate differentiated SEO strategies.
Content Optimization Suggestions: Based on SEO best practices, the system can provide suggestions for keyword optimization, content layout adjustments, and more to ensure content is not only search engine friendly but also improves user experience.
Batch Content Generation: The system can handle large volumes of content needs, automatically generating SEO-friendly articles while ensuring content coherence and relevance, thus improving content production efficiency.
Data Tracking and Optimization Strategies: The system can track a website's SEO and SEM data in real time and provide optimization suggestions based on data changes, helping companies maintain a competitive edge.
User Behavior Analysis and Traffic Strategy: Through detailed user profiling, the system can help companies better understand user needs and adjust SEO and SEM strategies accordingly to improve conversion rates.
Link Strategy Optimization: The system can assist in optimizing internal links and, by analyzing external link data, provide suggestions for building external links to enhance the overall SEO effectiveness of the website.
SEM Placement Optimization: Through real-time market analysis and ad performance tracking, the system can continuously optimize SEM strategies, helping companies maximize the effectiveness of their ad placements.

Conclusion

The SEO/SEM application scenarios based on LLM and Generative AI provide companies with new optimization pathways. From evaluation to content generation, user analysis, and link strategy optimization, LLM and Generative AI are reshaping SEO and SEM practices. As these technologies mature, companies will encounter more innovation and opportunities in digital marketing, achieving more efficient and precise marketing results.

Cost and Quality Assessment Methods in AI Model Development

September 15, 2024

In HaxiTAG's project and product development, assessing the cost and quality of AI models is a crucial step to ensure project success. This process involves not only precise technical and data analysis but also the scientific application and continuous improvement of evaluation methods. The following are detailed steps for cost and quality assessment, designed to help readers understand the complexities of this process more clearly.

1. Define Assessment Objectives

The primary task of assessment is to clarify objectives. Main objectives typically include enhancing model performance and reducing costs, while secondary objectives may involve optimizing resource allocation and improving team efficiency. Quality definitions should align with key quality indicators (KQIs), such as model accuracy, recall, and F1 score, which will serve as benchmarks for evaluating quality.

2. Identify Cost Types

Classifying costs is crucial. Direct costs include hardware, software, and personnel expenses, while indirect costs cover training, maintenance, and other related expenses. Identifying all relevant costs helps in more accurate budgeting and cost control.

3. Establish Quality Metrics

Quantifying quality metrics is central to the assessment. Metrics such as accuracy, recall, and F1 score effectively measure model performance. By setting and monitoring these metrics, one can ensure the effectiveness and stability of the model in practical applications.

4. Conduct Cost-Benefit Analysis

Analyzing the cost-benefit of different quality levels helps identify the most cost-effective solutions. This analysis assists evaluators in choosing the best balance between quality and cost within limited resources.

5. Data Collection

Comprehensive data collection is foundational to the assessment. This includes historical data and forecast data to ensure that the assessment is supported by ample information for making informed decisions.

6. Cost Estimation

Estimating the costs required to achieve various quality levels is a key step. Estimates should include both one-time and ongoing costs to fully reflect the financial needs of the project.

7. Quality Evaluation

Evaluating the model’s quality through experiments, testing, and user feedback is essential. This phase helps identify issues and make adjustments, ensuring that the model’s performance meets expectations in real-world applications.

8. Develop Evaluation Models

Utilize statistical and mathematical models to analyze the relationship between cost and quality. Developing models helps identify the impact of different variables on cost and quality, providing quantitative decision support.

9. Sensitivity Analysis

Assess the sensitivity of cost and quality metrics to changes in key variables. This analysis aids in understanding how different factors affect model performance, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the assessment.

10. Risk Assessment

Identify risk factors that may affect cost and quality and evaluate their likelihood and impact. This analysis provides a basis for risk management and helps in formulating mitigation strategies.

11. Decision Analysis

Use tools like decision trees and cost-benefit matrices to support decision-making. These tools help evaluators make informed choices in complex decision environments.

12. Define Assessment Standards

Determine acceptable quality standards and cost limits. Assessment standards should be set based on project requirements and market conditions to ensure the validity and practicality of the evaluation results.

13. Perform Cost-Quality Trade-Offs

Find the optimal balance between cost and quality. This process involves weighing the trade-offs between cost and quality to ensure effective resource utilization and achievement of project goals.

14. Implementation and Monitoring

Implement the selected solution and continuously monitor cost and quality. Ongoing monitoring and adjustments help maintain the desired quality levels and cost control throughout the project’s implementation.

15. Feedback Loop

Adjust assessment standards and methods based on implementation results. Feedback loops help refine the assessment process according to actual conditions, improving accuracy and practicality.

16. ROI Evaluation

Calculate the return on investment (ROI) to ensure that cost inputs lead to the anticipated quality improvements. ROI evaluation helps measure investment effectiveness and provides guidance for future investment decisions.

17. Continuous Improvement

Continuously optimize cost structures and enhance quality based on assessment results. Continuous improvement is crucial for achieving long-term project success.

18. Transparency and Communication

Ensure transparency in the assessment process and communicate results with all stakeholders. Effective communication helps gain support and feedback from various parties.

19. Compliance and Ethical Considerations

Ensure the assessment process complies with relevant regulations and ethical standards. This consideration is essential for maintaining the legality and integrity of the project.

20. Documentation

Document the assessment process and results to provide references for future evaluations. Detailed documentation aids in subsequent analysis and serves as a reference for similar projects.

In AI model development, assessing cost and quality requires in-depth expertise and meticulous data analysis. As technology evolves, assessment methods must be updated to adapt to new technologies and market conditions. Through scientific assessment methods, HaxiTAG can optimize project costs and quality, providing efficient AI solutions for clients.

The Path of AI Practice: Exploring the Wisdom from Theory to Application

September 12, 2024

In this new era known as the "Age of Artificial Intelligence," AI technology is penetrating every aspect of our lives at an unprecedented speed. However, for businesses and developers, transforming AI's theoretical advantages into practical applications remains a challenging topic. This article will delve into common issues and their solutions in AI enterprise applications, industrial applications, and product development, revealing the secrets of AI practice to the readers.

The Foundation of Intelligence: Methodological Choices

In the initial stage of AI product development, developers often face a crucial choice: should they use prompting, fine-tuning, pre-training, or retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)? This seemingly simple choice actually determines the success or failure of the entire project. Let's explore the essence of these methods together:

Prompting: This is the most direct method in AI applications. Imagine having a knowledgeable assistant who can provide the answers you need through clever questions. This method is ideal for rapid prototyping and cost-sensitive scenarios, making it perfect for small businesses and entrepreneurs.

Fine-Tuning: If prompting is akin to simply asking an AI questions, fine-tuning is about specialized training. It’s like turning a polymath into an expert in a specific field. For AI applications that need to excel in specific tasks, such as sentiment analysis or text classification, fine-tuning is the best choice.

Pre-Training: This is the most fundamental and important task in the AI field. It’s like building a vast knowledge base for AI, laying the foundation for various future applications. Although it is time-consuming and labor-intensive, it is a long-term strategy worth investing in for companies that need to build domain-specific models from scratch.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): This is an elegant fusion of AI technologies. Imagine combining the retrieval capabilities of a library with the creative talents of a writer. RAG is precisely such a method, particularly suitable for complex tasks requiring high accuracy and deep contextual understanding, such as intelligent customer service or advanced Q&A systems.

Scientific Guidance: Implementing Methodologies

After choosing the appropriate method, how do we scientifically implement these methods? This requires us to follow a rigorous scientific methodology:

Defining the Problem: This seemingly simple step is actually the most critical part of the entire process. As Einstein said, "If I had an hour to solve a problem, I'd spend 55 minutes defining it, and 5 minutes solving it."
Conducting a Literature Review: Standing on the shoulders of giants allows us to see further. By studying previous work, we can avoid redundant efforts and glean valuable insights.
Hypothesis Formation, Experiment Design, Data Collection, and Result Analysis: These steps form the core of scientific research. Throughout this process, we must remain objective and rigorous, continuously questioning and validating our hypotheses.
Integrating Findings into the Existing Knowledge System and Sharing with Peers: The value of knowledge lies in its dissemination and application. Only through sharing can our research truly advance the AI field.

Practical Wisdom: Strategies and Steps

In actual operations, we need to follow a clear set of strategies and steps:

Determining Metrics: Before starting, we need to define the success criteria of the project, which might be accuracy, recall rate, or other specific indicators.
Understanding Constraints and Costs: Every project has its limitations and costs. We need to be clearly aware of these factors to make reasonable decisions.
Gradually Exploring the Design Space: Starting from the simplest and most cost-effective solution, we gradually explore more complex solutions. This incremental approach helps us find the optimal balance.
Tracking ROI: At every step, we need to evaluate the relationship between input and output. This is not only financial management but also a scientific attitude.

Challenges and Considerations: Core Issues and Constraints

In AI product development, we must also face some core challenges:

Data Quality and Diversity: These are key factors influencing AI model performance. How to obtain high-quality, diverse data is a serious consideration for every AI project.
Model Transparency and Interpretability: In fields such as medical diagnosis or financial risk control, we not only need accurate results but also an understanding of how the model arrives at these results.
Cost and Resource Constraints: These are unavoidable factors in the real world. How to achieve maximum value with limited resources tests the wisdom of every developer.
Technological Maturity: We need to consider the current technological level. Choosing methods that suit the current technological maturity can help us avoid unnecessary risks.

Conclusion: Co-creating the Future of AI

AI development is at an exciting stage. Every day, we witness new breakthroughs and experience new possibilities. However, we also face unprecedented challenges. How can we promote technological innovation while protecting privacy? How can we ensure AI development benefits all humanity rather than exacerbating inequality? These are questions we need to think about and solve together.

As practitioners in the AI field, we bear a significant responsibility. We must not only pursue technological progress but also consider the social impact of technology. Let us work together with a scientific attitude and humanistic care to create a beautiful future for AI.

In this era full of possibilities, everyone has the potential to be a force for change. Whether you are an experienced developer or a newcomer to the AI field, I hope this article provides you with some inspiration and guidance. Let us explore the vast ocean of AI together, grow through practice, and contribute to the human wisdom enterprise.

Get GenAI guide

Thursday, July 31, 2025

Digital Maturity Assessment

Buy vs. Build: Technology Decision-Making

Capability Enablement and Team Empowerment

Capturing Value from Suppliers

Conclusion

Related topic:

Monday, July 28, 2025

Core Propositions and Key Trends

1. Accelerated Commercialization: From Pilots to Production-Grade Deployments

2. Efficiency and Revenue as Dual Drivers: The Business Value of AI Agents

3. Digital Culture and Organizational Evolution: A New Human-Machine Paradigm

Product and Use Case Insights: Lessons from HaxiTAG

Strategic Commentary and Recommendations

Conclusion

Related topic:

Wednesday, July 16, 2025

Digital Maturity Assessment

Technology: Buy or Build?

Upskilling the Team

Capturing Value from Suppliers

Conclusion

Related topic:

Monday, February 24, 2025

Research Background and Objectives

Key Research Findings

1. AI Usage is Predominantly Concentrated in Software Development and Writing Tasks

2. Quantifying the Depth of AI Integration Within Occupations

3. AI Excels in Tasks Requiring Cognitive Skills

4. Correlation Between AI Usage, Wage Levels, and Barriers to Entry

5. AI’s Dual Role in Automation and Augmentation

Research Methodology

Policy and Economic Implications

1. Comparing Predictions with Empirical Findings

2. AI’s Long-Term Impact on Occupations

Conclusion

Related Topic

Friday, October 18, 2024

Core Values and Innovations

Practical Application Scenarios and Functional Value

Conclusion

Related Topic

Sunday, September 15, 2024

1. Define Assessment Objectives

2. Identify Cost Types

3. Establish Quality Metrics

4. Conduct Cost-Benefit Analysis

5. Data Collection

6. Cost Estimation

7. Quality Evaluation

8. Develop Evaluation Models

9. Sensitivity Analysis

10. Risk Assessment

11. Decision Analysis

12. Define Assessment Standards

13. Perform Cost-Quality Trade-Offs

14. Implementation and Monitoring

15. Feedback Loop

16. ROI Evaluation

17. Continuous Improvement

18. Transparency and Communication

19. Compliance and Ethical Considerations

20. Documentation

Related Topic

Thursday, September 12, 2024

The Foundation of Intelligence: Methodological Choices

Scientific Guidance: Implementing Methodologies

Practical Wisdom: Strategies and Steps

Challenges and Considerations: Core Issues and Constraints

Conclusion: Co-creating the Future of AI

Related topic

Views

Product

Labels