Deep Insights and Foresight on Generative AI in Bank Credit

Driven by the twin forces of digitalization and rapid advances in artificial intelligence, generative AI (GenAI) is permeating and reshaping industries at an unprecedented pace. Financial services—especially bank credit, a data-intensive and decision-driven domain—has naturally become a prime testing ground for GenAI. McKinsey & Company’s latest research analyzes the current state, challenges, and future trajectory of GenAI in bank credit, presenting a landscape rich with opportunity yet calling for prudent execution. Building on McKinsey’s report and current practice, and from a fintech expert’s perspective, this article offers a comprehensive, professional analysis and commentary on GenAI’s intrinsic value, the shift in capability paradigms, risk-management strategies, and the road ahead—aimed at informing strategic decision makers in financial institutions.

At present, although roughly 52% of financial institutions worldwide rate GenAI as a strategic priority, only 12% of use cases in North America have actually gone live—a stark illustration of the gulf between strategic intent and operational reality. This gap reflects concerns over technical maturity and data governance, as well as the sector’s intrinsically cautious culture when adopting innovation. Even so, GenAI’s potential to lift efficiency, optimize risk management, and create commercial value is already visible, and is propelling the industry from manual workflows toward a smarter, more automated, and increasingly agentic paradigm.

GenAI’s Priority and Deployment in Banking: Opportunity with Friction

McKinsey’s research surfaces a striking pattern: globally, about 52% of financial institutions have placed GenAI high on their strategic agenda, signaling broad confidence in—and commitment to—this disruptive technology. In sharp contrast, however, only 12% of North American GenAI use cases are in production. This underscores the complexity of translating a transformative concept into operational reality and the inherent challenges institutions face when adopting emerging technologies.

1) Strategic Logic Behind the High Priority

GenAI’s prioritization is not a fad but a response to intensifying competition and evolving customer needs. To raise operational efficiency, improve customer experience, strengthen risk management, and explore new business models, banks are turning to GenAI’s strengths in content generation, summarization, intelligent Q&A, and process automation. For example, auto-drafting credit memos and accelerating information gathering can materially reduce turnaround time (TAT) and raise overall productivity. The report notes that most institutions emphasize “productivity gains” over near-term ROI, further evidencing GenAI as a strategic, long-horizon investment.

2) Why Production Rates Remain Low

Multiple factors explain the modest production penetration. First, technical maturity and stability matter: large language models (LLMs) still struggle with accuracy, consistency, and hallucinations—unacceptable risks in high-stakes finance. Second, data security and compliance are existential in banking. Training and using GenAI touches sensitive data; institutions must ensure privacy, encryption, isolation, and access control, and comply with KYC, AML, and fair-lending rules. Roughly 40% of institutions cite model validation, accuracy/hallucination risks, data security and regulatory uncertainty, and compute/data preparation costs as major constraints—hence the preference for “incremental pilots with reinforced controls.” Finally, deploying performant GenAI demands significant compute infrastructure and well-curated datasets, representing sizable investment for many institutions.

3) Divergent Maturity Across Use-Case Families

High-production use cases: ad-hoc document processing and Q&A. These lower-risk, moderate-complexity applications (e.g., internal knowledge retrieval, smart support) yield quick efficiency wins and often scale first as “document-level assistants.”
Pilot-dense use cases: credit-information synthesis, credit-memo drafting, and data assessment. These touch the core of credit workflows and require deep accuracy and decision support; value potential is high but validation cycles are longer.
Representative progress areas: information gathering and synthesis, credit-memo generation, early-warning systems (EWS), and customer engagement—where GenAI is already delivering discernible benefits.
Still-challenging frontier: end-to-end synthesis for integrated credit decisions. This demands complex reasoning, robust explainability, and tight integration with decision processes, lengthening time-to-production and elevating validation and compliance burdens.

In short, GenAI in bank credit is evolving from “strategic enthusiasm” to “prudent deployment.” Institutions must embrace opportunity while managing the attendant risks.

Paradigm Shift: From “Document-Level Assistant” to “Process-Level Collaborator”

A central insight in McKinsey’s report is the capability shift reshaping GenAI’s role in bank credit. Historically, AI acted as a supporting tool—“document-level assistants” for summarization, content generation, or simple customer interaction. With advances in GenAI and the rise of Agentic AI, we are witnessing a transformation from single-task tools to end-to-end process-level collaborators.

1) From the “Three Capabilities” to Agentic AI

The traditional triad—summarization, content generation, and engagement—boosts individual productivity but is confined to specific tasks/documents. By contrast, Agentic AI adds orchestrated intelligence: proactive sensing, planning, execution, and coordination across models, systems, and people. It understands end goals and autonomously triggers, sequences, and manages multiple GenAI models, traditional analytics, and human inputs to advance a business process.

2) A Vision for the End-to-End Credit Journey

Agentic AI as a “process-level collaborator” embeds across the acquisition–due diligence–underwriting–post-lending journey:

Acquisition: analyze market and customer data to surface prospects and generate tailored outreach; assist relationship managers (RMs) in initial engagement.
Due diligence: automatically gather, reconcile, and structure information from credit bureaus, financials, industry datasets, and news to auto-draft diligence reports.
Underwriting: a “credit agent” can notify RMs, propose tailored terms based on profiles and product rules, transcribe meetings, recall pertinent documents in real time, and auto-draft action lists and credit memos.
Post-lending: continuously monitor borrower health and macro signals for EWS; when risks emerge, trigger assessments and recommend responses; support collections with personalized strategies.

3) Orchestrated Intelligence: The Enabler

Realizing this vision requires:

Multi-model collaboration: coordinating GenAI (text, speech, vision) with traditional risk models.
Task decomposition and planning: breaking complex workflows into executable tasks with intelligent sequencing and resource allocation.
Human-in-the-loop interfaces: seamless checkpoints where experts review, steer, or override.
Feedback and learning loops: systematic learning from every execution to improve quality and robustness.

This shift elevates GenAI from a peripheral helper to a core process engine—heralding a smarter, more automated financial-services era.

Why Prudence—and How to Proceed: Balancing Innovation and Risk

Roughly 40% of institutions are cautious, favoring incremental pilots and strengthened controls. This prudence is not conservatism; it reflects thoughtful trade-offs across technology risk, data security, compliance, and economics.

1) Deeper Reasons for Caution

Model validation and hallucinations: opaque LLMs are hard to validate rigorously; hallucinated content in credit memos or risk reports can cause costly errors.
Data security and regulatory ambiguity: banking data are highly sensitive, and GenAI must meet stringent privacy, KYC/AML, fair-lending, and anti-discrimination standards amid evolving rules.
Compute and data-preparation costs: performant GenAI requires robust infrastructure and high-quality, well-governed data—significant, ongoing investment.

2) Practical Responses: Pilots, Controls, and Human-Machine Loops

Incremental pilots with reinforced controls: start with lower-risk domains to validate feasibility and value while continuously monitoring performance, output quality, security, and compliance.
Human-machine closed loop with “shift-left” controls: embed early-stage guardrails—KYC/AML checks, fair-lending screens, and real-time policy enforcement—to intercept issues “at the source,” reducing rework and downstream risk.
“Reusable service catalog + secure sandbox”: standardize RAG/extraction/evaluation components with clear permissioning; operate development, testing, and deployment in an isolated, governed environment; and manage external models/providers via clear SLAs, security, and compliance clauses.

Measuring Value: Efficiency, Risk, and Commercial Outcomes

GenAI’s value in bank credit is multi-dimensional, spanning efficiency, risk, and commercial performance.

1) Efficiency: Faster Flow and Better Resource Allocation

Shorter TAT: automate repetitive tasks (information gathering, document intake, data entry) to compress cycle times in underwriting and post-lending.
Lower document-handling hours: summarization, extraction, and generation cut time spent parsing contracts, financials, and legal documents.
Higher automation in memo drafting and QC: structured drafts and assisted QA boost speed and quality.
Greater concurrent throughput: automation raises case-handling capacity, especially in peak periods.

2) Risk: Earlier Signals and Finer Control

EWS recall and lead time: fusing internal transactions/behavior with external macro, industry, and sentiment data surfaces risks earlier and more accurately.
Improved PD/LGD/ECL trends: better predictions support precise pricing and provisioning, optimizing portfolio risk.
Monitoring and re-underwriting pass rates: automated checks, anomaly reports, and assessments increase coverage and compliance fidelity.

3) Commercial Impact: Profitability and Competitiveness

Approval rates and retention: faster, more accurate decisions lift approvals for good customers and strengthen loyalty via personalized engagement.
Consistent risk-based pricing / marginal RAROC: richer profiles enable finer, more consistent pricing, improving risk-adjusted returns.
Cash recovery and cost-to-collect: behavior-aware strategies raise recoveries and lower collection costs.

Conclusion and Outlook: Toward the Intelligent Bank

McKinsey’s report portrays a field where GenAI is already reshaping operations and competition in bank credit. Production penetration remains modest, and institutions face real hurdles in validation, security, compliance, and cost; yet GenAI’s potential to elevate efficiency, sharpen risk control, and expand commercial value is unequivocal.

Core takeaways

Strategic primacy, early deployment: GenAI ranks high strategically, but many use cases remain in pilots, revealing a scale-up gap.
Value over near-term ROI: institutions prioritize long-run productivity and strategic value.
Capability shift: from document-level assistants to process-level collaborators; Agentic AI, via orchestration, will embed across the credit journey.
Prudent progress: incremental pilots, tighter controls, human-machine loops, and “source-level” compliance reduce risk.
Multi-dimensional value: efficiency (TAT, hours), risk (EWS, PD/LGD/ECL), and growth (approvals, retention, RAROC) all move.
Infrastructure first: a reusable services catalog and secure sandbox underpin scale and governance.

Looking ahead

Agentic AI becomes mainstream: as maturity and trust grow, agentic systems will supplant single-function tools in core processes.
Data governance and compliance mature: institutions will invest in rigorous data quality, security, and standards—co-evolving with regulation.
Deeper human-AI symbiosis: GenAI augments rather than replaces, freeing experts for higher-value judgment and innovation.
Ecosystem collaboration: tighter partnerships with tech firms, regulators, and academia will accelerate innovation and best-practice diffusion.

What winning institutions will do

Set a clear GenAI strategy: position GenAI within digital transformation, identify high-value scenarios, and phase a realistic roadmap.
Invest in data foundations: governance, quality, and security supply the model “fuel.”
Build capabilities and talent: cultivate hybrid AI-and-finance expertise and partner externally where prudent.
Embed risk and compliance by design: manage GenAI across its lifecycle with strong guardrails.
Start small, iterate fast: validate value via pilots, capture learnings, and scale deliberately.

GenAI offers banks an unprecedented opening—not merely a tool for efficiency but a strategic engine to reinvent operating models, elevate customer experience, and build durable advantage. With prudent yet resolute execution, the industry will move toward a more intelligent, efficient, and customer-centric future.

Menu

HaxiTAG

Your Trusted Partner for Intelligent Transformation and AI Industry Solutions

Get GenAI guide

Thursday, November 6, 2025